Thomas Homer-Dixon

16 results found for: Climate Policy


May 4th, 2016 —

Start the Leap revolution without me

Toronto Globe and Mail, April 22, 2016 The Leap Manifesto is a Rorschach ink-blot test of one’s political and economic ideology. To take the test, just read the document’s first four sentences: “We start from the premise that Canada is facing the deepest crisis in recent memory. The Truth and Reconciliation Commission has acknowledged shocking details about [...]

Read more »


December 14th, 2015 —

Don’t Peddle Climate Fantasies

At long last, almost all the world’s countries have explicitly acknowledged that global warming is a staggering threat to our well-being and have laid out a plan – albeit, at best, a partial one – to respond to this threat. But the hard work is only beginning.

Read more »


June 10th, 2015 —

Scientists Call for an Oil Sands Moratorium

Consensus statement says the science is clear: there can be no more oils sands development if we are to solve the global climate crisis. More than 100 prominent scientists from across North America, including climate scientists, economists, geophysicists, and biologists, released a consensus statement entitled “Ten Reasons for a Moratorium” that shows why Canada and [...]

Read more »


August 6th, 2014 —

Consider the Global Impacts of Oil Pipelines

Nature, Comment As scientists spanning diverse disciplines, we urge North American leaders to take a step back: no new oil-sands projects should move forward unless developments are consistent with national and international commitments to reducing carbon pollution. Anything less demonstrates flawed policies and failed leadership. Go to: Consider the Global Impacts of Oil Pipelines.

Read more »


June 23rd, 2014 —

Fix the link where science and policy meet

To judge whether the government’s decisions are grounded in scientific knowledge, the public needs access to the expertise and information decision-makers use. Restricting this access damages our democracy.

Read more »


October 7th, 2013 —

Climate Uncertainty Shouldn’t Mean Inaction

People who argue for inaction on climate change are betting that the vast majority of climate scientists are wrong. The balance of evidence is decisively against them.

Read more »


April 3rd, 2013 —

Podcast: Interview on CBC Radio One ‘As It Happens’

Interview on CBC Radio’s As It Happens discussing “The Tar Sands Disaster.” Thomas Homer-Dixon, Canadian author of The Ingenuity Gap and The Upside of Down, wrote an editorial in this past Sunday’s New York Times, entitled “The Tar Sands Disaster” — one that is bound to heat up the debate around the politics of Alberta bitumen. [...]

Read more »


April 1st, 2013 —

The Tar Sands Disaster

President Obama rejected the pipeline last year but now must decide whether to approve a new proposal from TransCanada, the pipeline company. Saying no won’t stop tar sands development by itself, because producers are busy looking for other export routes — west across the Rockies to the Pacific Coast, east to Quebec, or south by rail to the United States. Each alternative faces political, technical or economic challenges as opponents fight to make the industry unviable.

Read more »


December 12th, 2011 —

Climate Summit Was a Pathetic Exercise in Deceit

There’s really only one label for the pathetic exercise we’ve just witnessed in South Africa: deceit. The whole climate-change negotiation process and the larger political discourse surrounding this horrible problem is a drawn-out and elaborate exercise in lying—to each other, to ourselves, and especially to our children. And the lies are starting to corrupt our civilization from inside out.

Read more »


October 30th, 2008 —

Climate Change, the Arctic, and Canada: Avoiding Yesterday’s Analysis of Tomorrow’s Crisis

Canadian policy makers should shift their attention and resources commensurately. While policymakers, wedded to an outmoded worldview, fret about what Arctic climate change might do to national power directly in the basin, human wellbeing could be devastated around the world by cascading consequences of shifts in the Arctic’s energy balance. Ironically, these changes could – in the end – do far more damage to state-centric world order and even to states’ narrowly defined interests than any interstate conflicts we might see happen in the newly blue waters of the Arctic.

Read more »


« Next Page of Results
Print Friendly